测试ActiveMQ主从复制
前天搭建了一个避免单点故障的基于zokeeper和leveldb的store。昨天测过了，kill掉Master，客户端确实是可以自动切换到被新推举出来的broker。但是消息是否也被复制过去了。会不会造成消息的丢失还需要测试一下。 测试流程
1.编写Sender和Receiver代码，通过客户端配置failover 进行一次正常的消息的发送和收，确保消息的传递是正常的。
2.通过Sender发送一段正常的消息到broker，但是不接受，然后kill 掉当前主broker，然后在运行Receiver代码，查看消息是否接受到。 步骤一
package com.shiquanjiumei.test;
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.ConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.DeliveryMode;
import javax.jms.Destination;
import javax.jms.MessageProducer;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.TextMessage;
import org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection;
import org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory;
public class TestMQSender {
private static final int SEND_NUMBER = 5;
public static void main(String[] args)
{ // ConnectionFactory ：连接工厂，JMS 用它创建连接
ConnectionFactory connectionFactory;
// Connection ：JMS 客户端到JMS Provider 的连接
Connection connection = null;
// Session： 一个发送或接收消息的线程
Session session;
// Destination ：消息的目的地;消息发送给谁.
Destination destination;
// MessageProducer：消息发送者
MessageProducer producer;
// TextMessage message;
// 构造ConnectionFactory实例对象，此处采用ActiveMq的实现
jar connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory( ActiveMQConnection.DEFAULT_USER, ActiveMQConnection.DEFAULT_PASSWORD,
"failover:(tcp://IP:61616,tcp://IP:61617,tcp://IP:61618)"); try { // 构造从工厂得到连接对象 connection = connectionFactory.createConnection();
// 启动
connection.start();
// 获取操作连接
session = connection.createSession(Boolean.TRUE, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
// 获取session注意参数值xingbo.xu-queue是一个服务器的queue，须在在ActiveMq的console配置
destination = session.createQueue("FirstQueue");
// 得到消息生成者【发送者】
producer = session.createProducer(destination);
// 设置不持久化，此处学习，实际根据项目决定
producer.setDeliveryMode(DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT);
// 构造消息，此处写死，项目就是参数，或者方法获取
sendMessage(session, producer); session.commit();
} catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally {
try { if (null != connection) connection.close(); } catch (Throwable ignore) { } } }
public static void sendMessage(Session session, MessageProducer producer) throws Exception {
// for (int i = 1; i <= SEND_NUMBER; i++) {
TextMessage message = session .createTextMessage("ActiveMq 发送的消息:yivan" /*+ i*/);
// 发送消息到目的地方 System.out.println("发送消息：" + "ActiveMq 发送的消息：yivan" /*+ i*/);
producer.send(message);
// }
} }
接受端代码
package com.shiquanjiumei.test;
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.ConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.Destination;
import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.TextMessage;
import org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection;
import org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory;
public class TestMQReceiver {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// ConnectionFactory ：连接工厂，JMS 用它创建连接
ConnectionFactory connectionFactory;
// Connection ：JMS 客户端到JMS Provider 的连接
Connection connection = null; // Session： 一个发送或接收消息的线程
Session session;
// Destination ：消息的目的地;消息发送给谁.
Destination destination;
// 消费者，消息接收者
MessageConsumer consumer; connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory( ActiveMQConnection.DEFAULT_USER, ActiveMQConnection.DEFAULT_PASSWORD,
"failover:(tcp://IP:61616,tcp://IP:61617,tcp://IP:61618)"); try {
// 构造从工厂得到连接对象
connection = connectionFactory.createConnection();
// 启动 connection.start();
// 获取操作连接
session = connection.createSession(Boolean.FALSE, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
// 获取session注意参数值xingbo.xu-queue是一个服务器的queue，须在在ActiveMq的console配置
destination = session.createQueue("FirstQueue"); consumer = session.createConsumer(destination); while (true) {
//设置接收者接收消息的时间，为了便于测试，这里谁定为100s
TextMessage message = (TextMessage) consumer.receive(100000);
if (null != message) { System.out.println("收到消息" + message.getText()); } else { break; } } }
catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { try { if (null != connection) connection.close(); } catch (Throwable ignore) { } } } }
步骤一比较简单,结果表明现阶段运行时正常的
发送消息：ActiveMq 发送的消息：yivan
步骤二
先运行Sender，向队列中发送消息，可以看到有一条待消费信息，但是没有消费者。 
接下来，登录linux kill掉主Master，我现在的Master是61617.通过观察日志
在杀死主进程的一刹那是拒绝链接的，最后当61618被推出来当主的时候，又正常了。
DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,718 org.apache.activemq.util.ThreadPoolUtils: Forcing shutdown of ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@288c2c89[Running, pool size = 1, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 1] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,718 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Attempting 7th connect to: tcp://127.0.0.1:61616 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,719 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Connect fail to: tcp://127.0.0.1:61616, reason: java.net.ConnectException: 拒绝连接 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,719 org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport: Stopping transport tcp://127.0.0.1:61616 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,719 org.apache.activemq.thread.TaskRunnerFactory: Initialized TaskRunnerFactory[ActiveMQ Task] using ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@61501cb0[Running, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,722 org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport$1: Closed socket Socket[unconnected] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,722 org.apache.activemq.util.ThreadPoolUtils: Forcing shutdown of ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@61501cb0[Running, pool size = 1, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 1] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,722 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Attempting 7th connect to: tcp://127.0.0.1:61617 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,723 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Connect fail to: tcp://127.0.0.1:61617, reason: java.net.ConnectException: 拒绝连接 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,724 org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport: Stopping transport tcp://127.0.0.1:61617 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,724 org.apache.activemq.thread.TaskRunnerFactory: Initialized TaskRunnerFactory[ActiveMQ Task] using ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@4a66875b[Running, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 0] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,724 org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport$1: Closed socket Socket[unconnected] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,724 org.apache.activemq.util.ThreadPoolUtils: Forcing shutdown of ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@4a66875b[Running, pool size = 1, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 1] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:12,725 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Waiting 1280 ms before attempting connection DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:14,006 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: urlList connectionList:[tcp://127.0.0.1:61618, tcp://127.0.0.1:61616, tcp://127.0.0.1:61617], from: [tcp://127.0.0.1:61616, tcp://127.0.0.1:61617, tcp://127.0.0.1:61618] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:14,006 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Waiting 2560 ms before attempting connection. DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,196 org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet: DispatcherServlet with name 'front' processing POST request for [/clouds/customer/getcustomerdata.shtml] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,196 org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.AbstractUrlHandlerMapping: Mapping [/customer/getcustomerdata.shtml] to HandlerExecutionChain with handler [com.shiquanjiumei.controller.interfaces.CustomerDataController@58c8b978] and 1 interceptor DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,197 org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.support.HandlerMethodInvoker: Invoking request handler method: public void com.shiquanjiumei.controller.interfaces.CustomerDataController.getCustomerMessage(java.lang.String,java.lang.String,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest,javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse) throws java.net.UnknownHostException DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,197 org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory: Returning cached instance of singleton bean 'transactionManager' DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,197 org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager: Creating new transaction with name [com.shiquanjiumei.service.impl.BaseSetingServiceImpl.getCustomerMessage]: PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,ISOLATION_DEFAULT; '' DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,197 com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool: trace com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool@1db6ed76 [managed: 6, unused: 5, excluded: 0] (e.g. com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewPooledConnection@20f78840) DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,197 org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager: Acquired Connection [com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyConnection@1fc9a6ad] for JDBC transaction DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,197 org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager: Switching JDBC Connection [com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyConnection@1fc9a6ad] to manual commit DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,198 org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionUtils: Creating a new SqlSession DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,198 org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionUtils: Registering transaction synchronization for SqlSession [org.apache.ibatis.session.defaults.DefaultSqlSession@6fddb828] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,198 org.mybatis.spring.transaction.SpringManagedTransaction: JDBC Connection [com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyConnection@1fc9a6ad] will be managed by Spring DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,199 org.apache.ibatis.logging.jdbc.BaseJdbcLogger: ==> Preparing: select * from t_customer where registerTime between ? and ? DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,199 org.apache.ibatis.logging.jdbc.BaseJdbcLogger: ==> Parameters: 2015-12-09 03:07:30(String), 2015-12-09 03:07:40(String) DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.apache.ibatis.logging.jdbc.BaseJdbcLogger: <== Total: 0 DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionUtils: Releasing transactional SqlSession [org.apache.ibatis.session.defaults.DefaultSqlSession@6fddb828] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionUtils$SqlSessionSynchronization: Transaction synchronization committing SqlSession [org.apache.ibatis.session.defaults.DefaultSqlSession@6fddb828] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionUtils$SqlSessionSynchronization: Transaction synchronization deregistering SqlSession [org.apache.ibatis.session.defaults.DefaultSqlSession@6fddb828] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionUtils$SqlSessionSynchronization: Transaction synchronization closing SqlSession [org.apache.ibatis.session.defaults.DefaultSqlSession@6fddb828] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager: Initiating transaction commit DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,200 org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager: Committing JDBC transaction on Connection [com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyConnection@1fc9a6ad] DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,201 org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager: Releasing JDBC Connection [com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyConnection@1fc9a6ad] after transaction DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,201 org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceUtils: Returning JDBC Connection to DataSource DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,201 com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool: trace com.mchange.v2.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool@1db6ed76 [managed: 6, unused: 5, excluded: 0] (e.g. com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewPooledConnection@20f78840) DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,201 org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet: Null ModelAndView returned to DispatcherServlet with name 'front': assuming HandlerAdapter completed request handling DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,202 org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet: Successfully completed request DEBUG 2015-12-09 15:07:16,566 org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport: Attempting 8th connect to: tcp://127.0.0.1:61618
但是当我查看后台或者运行接受Receiveder代码的时候，原来的消息丢失了。这怎么可以，这还怎么玩。 
其实问题在Sender的代码中
将NON_PERSISTENT 改为PERSISTENT
// 设置不持久化，实际根据项目决定 producer.setDeliveryMode(DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT);
在运行一遍测试流程2，发现及时当时收到消息的是server1 ，你讲server1 kill 掉后，用Recevieder的代码从新的broker中接受依旧能接受到，原因就是他进行了LevelDB本地存贮，这种文件系统是从ActiveMQ5.8之后引进的，它和KahaDB非常相似，也是基于文件的本地数据库储存形式，但是它提供比KahaDB更快的持久性。
以上是测试ActiveMQ主从复制的全部内容，在云栖社区的博客、问答、公众号、人物、课程等栏目也有测试ActiveMQ主从复制的相关内容，欢迎继续使用右上角搜索按钮进行搜索activemq ，以便于您获取更多的相关知识。