Spring Security3源码分析-FilterSecurityInterceptor分析
FilterSecurityInterceptor过滤器对应的类路径为
org.springframework.security.web.access.intercept.FilterSecurityInterceptor
这个filter是filterchain中比较复杂,也是比较核心的过滤器,主要负责授权的工作
在看这个filter源码之前,先来看看spring是如何构造filter这个bean的
具体的构造过程的代码片段为
//这个方法源自HttpConfigurationBuilder类 void createFilterSecurityInterceptor(BeanReference authManager) { //判断是否配置了use-expressions属性 boolean useExpressions = FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSourceParser.isUseExpressions(httpElt); //根据intercept-url标签列表创建授权需要的元数据信息。后面仔细分析 BeanDefinition securityMds = FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSourceParser.createSecurityMetadataSource(interceptUrls, httpElt, pc); RootBeanDefinition accessDecisionMgr; //创建voter列表 ManagedList<BeanDefinition> voters = new ManagedList<BeanDefinition>(2); //如果是使用了表达式,使用WebExpressionVoter //没使用表达式,就使用RoleVoter、AuthenticatedVoter if (useExpressions) { voters.add(new RootBeanDefinition(WebExpressionVoter.class)); } else { voters.add(new RootBeanDefinition(RoleVoter.class)); voters.add(new RootBeanDefinition(AuthenticatedVoter.class)); } //定义授权的决策管理类AffirmativeBased accessDecisionMgr = new RootBeanDefinition(AffirmativeBased.class); //添加依赖的voter列表 accessDecisionMgr.getPropertyValues().addPropertyValue("decisionVoters", voters); accessDecisionMgr.setSource(pc.extractSource(httpElt)); // Set up the access manager reference for http String accessManagerId = httpElt.getAttribute(ATT_ACCESS_MGR); //如果未定义access-decision-manager-ref属性,就使用默认的 //AffirmativeBased if (!StringUtils.hasText(accessManagerId)) { accessManagerId = pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(accessDecisionMgr); pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(accessDecisionMgr, accessManagerId)); } //创建FilterSecurityInterceptor过滤器 BeanDefinitionBuilder builder = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(FilterSecurityInterceptor.class); //添加决策管理器 builder.addPropertyReference("accessDecisionManager", accessManagerId); //添加认证管理类 builder.addPropertyValue("authenticationManager", authManager); if ("false".equals(httpElt.getAttribute(ATT_ONCE_PER_REQUEST))) { builder.addPropertyValue("observeOncePerRequest", Boolean.FALSE); } //添加授权需要的安全元数据资源 builder.addPropertyValue("securityMetadataSource", securityMds); BeanDefinition fsiBean = builder.getBeanDefinition(); //向ioc容器注册bean String fsiId = pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(fsiBean); pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(fsiBean,fsiId)); // Create and register a DefaultWebInvocationPrivilegeEvaluator for use with taglibs etc. BeanDefinition wipe = new RootBeanDefinition(DefaultWebInvocationPrivilegeEvaluator.class); wipe.getConstructorArgumentValues().addGenericArgumentValue(new RuntimeBeanReference(fsiId)); pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(wipe, pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(wipe))); this.fsi = new RuntimeBeanReference(fsiId); }
现在再仔细分析创建元数据资源的bean过程
static BeanDefinition createSecurityMetadataSource(List<Element> interceptUrls, Element elt, ParserContext pc) { //创建Url处理类,有两个实现:AntUrlPathMatcher、RegexUrlPathMatcher UrlMatcher matcher = HttpSecurityBeanDefinitionParser.createUrlMatcher(elt); boolean useExpressions = isUseExpressions(elt); //解析intercept-url标签,构造所有需要拦截url的map信息 //map中的key:RequestKey的bean定义,value:SecurityConfig的bean定义 ManagedMap<BeanDefinition, BeanDefinition> requestToAttributesMap = parseInterceptUrlsForFilterInvocationRequestMap( interceptUrls, useExpressions, pc); BeanDefinitionBuilder fidsBuilder; if (useExpressions) { //定义表达式处理类的bean Element expressionHandlerElt = DomUtils.getChildElementByTagName(elt, Elements.EXPRESSION_HANDLER); String expressionHandlerRef = expressionHandlerElt == null ? null : expressionHandlerElt.getAttribute("ref"); if (StringUtils.hasText(expressionHandlerRef)) { logger.info("Using bean '" + expressionHandlerRef + "' as web SecurityExpressionHandler implementation"); } else { BeanDefinition expressionHandler = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(DefaultWebSecurityExpressionHandler.class).getBeanDefinition(); expressionHandlerRef = pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(expressionHandler); pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(expressionHandler, expressionHandlerRef)); } //定义表达式类型的FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource fidsBuilder = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(ExpressionBasedFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource.class); //通过构造函数注入依赖 fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(matcher); fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(requestToAttributesMap); fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgReference(expressionHandlerRef); } else { //定义非表达式类型的FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource fidsBuilder = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(DefaultFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource.class); //通过构造函数注入依赖 fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(matcher); fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(requestToAttributesMap); } fidsBuilder.addPropertyValue("stripQueryStringFromUrls", matcher instanceof AntUrlPathMatcher); fidsBuilder.getRawBeanDefinition().setSource(pc.extractSource(elt)); return fidsBuilder.getBeanDefinition(); }
通过以上的bean构造过程,FilterSecurityInterceptor所依赖的决策管理器、认证管理器、安全元数据资源都具备了,该让FilterSecurityInterceptor干活了,其源码为
public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException { //封装request, response, chain,方便参数传递、增加代码阅读性 FilterInvocation fi = new FilterInvocation(request, response, chain); invoke(fi); } public void invoke(FilterInvocation fi) throws IOException, ServletException { if ((fi.getRequest() != null) && (fi.getRequest().getAttribute(FILTER_APPLIED) != null) && observeOncePerRequest) { if (fi.getRequest() != null) { fi.getRequest().setAttribute(FILTER_APPLIED, Boolean.TRUE); } //执行父类beforeInvocation,类似于aop中的before InterceptorStatusToken token = super.beforeInvocation(fi); try { //filter传递 fi.getChain().doFilter(fi.getRequest(), fi.getResponse()); } finally { //执行父类的afterInvocation,类似于aop中的after super.afterInvocation(token, null); } } }
继续看父类的beforeInvocation方法,其中省略了一些不重要的代码片段
protected InterceptorStatusToken beforeInvocation(Object object) { //根据SecurityMetadataSource获取配置的权限属性 Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes = this.obtainSecurityMetadataSource().getAttributes(object); //省略…… //判断是否需要对认证实体重新认证,默认为否 Authentication authenticated = authenticateIfRequired(); // Attempt authorization try { //决策管理器开始决定是否授权,如果授权失败,直接抛出AccessDeniedException this.accessDecisionManager.decide(authenticated, object, attributes); } catch (AccessDeniedException accessDeniedException) { publishEvent(new AuthorizationFailureEvent(object, attributes, authenticated, accessDeniedException)); throw accessDeniedException; } }
增加说明
Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes = this.obtainSecurityMetadataSource().getAttributes(object);
这里获取的是权限列表信息,比如说有这个配置
<security:intercept-urlpattern="/index.jsp*"access="ROLE_USER,ROLE_ADMIN"/>
如果现在发起一个请求时index.jsp,那么根据这个请求返回的attributes集合就是分别包含ROLE_USER,ROLE_ADMIN属性的两个SecurityConfig对象
至于请求url如何匹配的,大家可以通过阅读DefaultFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource类的源码,实际上,这里用到了spring的路径匹配工具类org.springframework.util.AntPathMatcher
AntPathMatcher匹配方式的通配符有三种:
?(匹配任何单字符),*(匹配0或者任意数量的字符),**(匹配0或者更多的目录)
由于之前在bean的定义过程已经知道决策管理器是AffirmativeBased,接着看AffirmativeBased的决策过程
public void decide(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> configAttributes) throws AccessDeniedException { int deny = 0; //循环voters,实际上是RoleVoter、AuthenticatedVoter for (AccessDecisionVoter voter : getDecisionVoters()) { //把具体的决策任务交给voter处理 //voter只返回-1、0、1,只有为1才算授权成功 int result = voter.vote(authentication, object, configAttributes); if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) { logger.debug("Voter: " + voter + ", returned: " + result); } switch (result) { case AccessDecisionVoter.ACCESS_GRANTED: return; case AccessDecisionVoter.ACCESS_DENIED: deny++; break; default: break; } } //只要有一个voter拒绝了,则直接抛出访问拒绝异常 if (deny > 0) { throw new AccessDeniedException(messages.getMessage("AbstractAccessDecisionManager.accessDenied", "Access is denied")); } // To get this far, every AccessDecisionVoter abstained checkAllowIfAllAbstainDecisions(); }
实际上,有三种决策管理器,分别为AffirmativeBased、ConsensusBased、UnanimousBased,各自决策的区别是:
AffirmativeBased:只要有一个voter投同意票,就授权成功
ConsensusBased:只要投同意票的大于投反对票的,就授权成功
UnanimousBased:需要一致通过才授权成功具体决策规则很简单,只是根据voter返回的结果做处理
接下来,分别看RoleVoter、AuthenticatedVoter的源码
RoleVoter:
public int vote(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes) { int result = ACCESS_ABSTAIN; //从认证实体中获取所有的权限列表 Collection<GrantedAuthority> authorities = extractAuthorities(authentication); //循环intercept-url配置的access权限列表 for (ConfigAttribute attribute : attributes) { if (this.supports(attribute)) { result = ACCESS_DENIED; // Attempt to find a matching granted authority //循环认证实体所拥有的权限列表 for (GrantedAuthority authority : authorities) { if (attribute.getAttribute().equals(authority.getAuthority())) { //只要有相同的权限,直接返回成功1 return ACCESS_GRANTED; } } } } return result; }
AuthenticatedVoter:
public int vote(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes) { int result = ACCESS_ABSTAIN; for (ConfigAttribute attribute : attributes) { if (this.supports(attribute)) { result = ACCESS_DENIED; if (IS_AUTHENTICATED_FULLY.equals(attribute.getAttribute())) { if (isFullyAuthenticated(authentication)) { return ACCESS_GRANTED; } } if (IS_AUTHENTICATED_REMEMBERED.equals(attribute.getAttribute())) { if (authenticationTrustResolver.isRememberMe(authentication) || isFullyAuthenticated(authentication)) { return ACCESS_GRANTED; } } if (IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY.equals(attribute.getAttribute())) { if (authenticationTrustResolver.isAnonymous(authentication) || isFullyAuthenticated(authentication) || authenticationTrustResolver.isRememberMe(authentication)) { return ACCESS_GRANTED; } } } } return result; }
由于RoleVoter在list列表中的位置处于AuthenticatedVoter前面,只要RoleVoter通过,就不会再执行AuthenticatedVoter了。实际上AuthenticatedVoter只会对IS_AUTHENTICATED_FULLY、IS_AUTHENTICATED_REMEMBERED、IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY三种权限做vote处理。